Dave-the-rave
Forum GOD!
Actually I don't know why I quoted your post. I wasn't addressing you specifically.
Firstly because if you know you’ve had it and it was mild it’s likely that if you did get it again it would also be mild because your body has a head start with the antibodies, secondly because statistics are useful for tracking the thing, thirdly because if I know I’ve had it I know my wife and daughter have also been exposed to it and not had much if any reaction suggesting that they’re not particularly susceptible. Also, if the test is negative despite the number of people I’ve come into contact with at the hospital, including going into the Covid areas and having direct contact with the staff working in those areas that suggests that the chances of me catching it are not that big.Why test? Can't tell you when you had it if it's positive, and can't tell you anything with 100% accuracy either way. But if you die they will probably list CCP virus as either the cause or a contributing factor. If you got better just move on like you always have before when you were sick and got better.
But if the test isn't reliable the results can't be trusted.Firstly because if you know you’ve had it and it was mild it’s likely that if you did get it again it would also be mild because your body has a head start with the antibodies, secondly because statistics are useful for tracking the thing, thirdly because if I know I’ve had it I know my wife and daughter have also been exposed to it and not had much if any reaction suggesting that they’re not particularly susceptible. Also, if the test is negative despite the number of people I’ve come into contact with at the hospital, including going into the Covid areas and having direct contact with the staff working in those areas that suggests that the chances of me catching it are not that big.
Personally I don’t really care when I had it, I just want to know if I did.
The Roche test is 100% accurate for positive results and 99.7% accurate for negatives. You’ll never get 100% for negative results as you can’t prove a negative. That’s reliable enough for me, and for the NHS.But if the test isn't reliable the results can't be trusted.
That some sort of apology?Actually I don't know why I quoted your post. I wasn't addressing you specifically.
I don't think he meant to offend.That some sort of apology?
I don't feel the need to apologise.That some sort of apology?
Similar situation with me just before Xmas. Very bad 'flu' i.e. completely knocked out for 4 days followed by a persistent dry cough that took weeks to shake off. Would certainly like to get an antibody test, but not sure how without having to pay for it.We all had Covid type symptoms before it supposedly was here, my wife’s colleague had same symptoms as did a few of her colleagues. Wife’s colleague was anti body tested, Came back positive for anti bodies, Mrs Northam along with colleagues tested negative. False negs ? Not knowing enough still about Covid ? Good enough testing ? Who knows !
I was being sarcasticI don't feel the need to apologise.
He did a good job of itI don't think he meant to offend.
Some say that Cov2 may existed in many countries before the official WHO declared it. But it wouldn't be easy to catch it like now.Similar situation with me just before Xmas. Very bad 'flu' i.e. completely knocked out for 4 days followed by a persistent dry cough that took weeks to shake off. Would certainly like to get an antibody test, but not sure how without having to pay for it.